Instaloader alternatives for Instagram hashtag posts
Published
The right Instaloader alternative depends on what broke. If Instaloader still runs for you and you want the photos and videos on disk, stay with it: nothing below is better at that. If you want to keep writing Python but need more of Instagram's surface than Instaloader exposes, instagrapi is the library people move to. If you are tired of babysitting a script and want the hashtag's posts as rows on a schedule, a hosted service is the swap, and the choice there is between paying per request (HikerAPI) and paying per post delivered (the hosted actor this site documents).
Everything below about Instaloader comes from its own documentation, version 4.15.3, as of September 2026. Figures about HikerAPI come from hikerapi.com/pricing, read in September 2026. Figures about instagrapi come from its GitHub repository in September 2026.
Why people look for an Instaloader alternative
Instaloader is a good tool. It is free, it is MIT licensed, it installs with pip install instaloader, and it is still maintained. People rarely leave it because it is bad. They leave for one of four reasons.
- Hashtags need a login. Instaloader's own usage page lists
"#hashtag"as a target with the note: "Posts with a certain hashtag (the quotes are usually necessary). Requires login." So a hashtag job was never anonymous, and the account you sign in with carries the risk. - Logging in is the fragile part. The troubleshooting page says users "reported problems with logging in" across several issues, recommends keeping the session file, and ships a script that imports session cookies from Firefox to get around the login procedure.
- Rate limits, especially on a server. The same page warns that restarting Instaloader often "within short time is prone to cause a 429", and that cloud, VPN and proxy addresses "might be subject to significantly stricter limits for anonymous access."
- It is a downloader. Its purpose is saving pictures and videos with metadata files beside them. If what you want is a spreadsheet of posts, you are converting its output every time.
None of those is a defect. They are what running your own client against Instagram costs. The question is whether you would rather pay that cost in time or in money.
Who should stay with Instaloader
If any of these describes you, keep Instaloader.
- You want the media files. Pictures and videos, named the way you choose with
--filename-pattern, sitting in a folder. That is what it is for, and a row-based service gives you a URL to the image at best. - The job is occasional. One pull of a hashtag for a report, run from your own laptop on your own home connection, is one command and costs nothing.
- You already have a working session file. The troubleshooting page notes that session files "usually do not expire." If yours works, the fragile step is already behind you.
- You need profiles, stories or your saved posts too. Instaloader covers far more of Instagram than hashtags alone, from one tool.
Our longer look at the open source options, including which GitHub scrapers still run, is in Instagram scraper GitHub projects, and which ones still run.
Instaloader alternatives compared
| Instaloader | instagrapi | HikerAPI | Hosted hashtag actor (this site) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Python CLI and module | Python library | Hosted API | Hosted Apify actor |
| Price (September 2026) | free | free | $1 per 1,000 requests on the popular plan, $0.60 at volume | $0.0005 per delivered post |
| Needs your Instagram login | yes, for hashtags | yes | no | yes, a session cookie |
| Where it runs | your machine | your machine | their servers | Apify's servers |
| Output | media files plus metadata | Python objects | JSON responses | dataset rows (JSON, CSV and more) |
| Result limit | --count | in your code | per request | resultsLimit, exact |
| Date filter | --post-filter expression | in your code | in your code | onlyPostsNewerThan stops the run |
| Scheduling | cron, your job | your job | your job | Apify schedules |
instagrapi: the Python library people move to
instagrapi describes itself on GitHub as "The fastest and powerful Python library for Instagram Private API". It is MIT licensed. Where Instaloader is shaped around downloading, instagrapi is shaped around calling Instagram as an app would, so it reaches more of the platform: its README lists users, media, comments, locations, hashtags, collections, direct messages and insights, plus uploads of photos, videos and reels.
It is a move sideways, not away. You still sign in with an account, you still run it somewhere, and you still own every rate limit and challenge Instagram throws at that account. People switch to it when they need something Instaloader does not expose, not when they want to stop maintaining a scraper.
Pick instagrapi if:
- you are writing a Python application and Instagram is one part of it;
- you need write actions or endpoints Instaloader lacks;
- you are comfortable handling login challenges in code.
HikerAPI: somebody else runs the client
HikerAPI is a hosted Instagram API. Its pricing page headline reads:
Instagram API cost: $0.60 per 1,000 requests at volume, $1 per 1,000 on the popular plan. Pay per request, no subscription, no lock-in. 100 free requests.
A Hashtags API sits in its list of endpoints next to profiles, posts, reels, stories, followers, comments, locations and search. You do not sign in to Instagram yourself. You send requests with an API key and pay from a prepaid balance that, per its FAQ, never expires.
Two details matter for a hashtag job:
- It bills per request. The page does not say how many posts one hashtag request returns, so the cost of "last week of #coffee" depends on paging you will only see once you run it.
- It charges for more than 200s. The FAQ says: "We charge for any successful response (such as 200, 400, 403, 404)." 50x errors are not charged.
Pick HikerAPI if you need many kinds of Instagram data through one key and you would rather never touch a session cookie. A wider comparison of hosted APIs is in Instagram hashtag API options compared.
The hosted hashtag actor: rows, billed per delivered post
The actor this site documents does one job: give it a hashtag and it writes that hashtag's recent posts, newest first, to an Apify dataset. It charges $0.0005 per delivered post, and Apify's compute and storage are included in that price.
It still needs a signed-in Instagram session, like Instagram requires of Instaloader. You paste the sessionid and csrftoken cookies from a browser signed in to an account you control. What it takes off your hands is everything around that: the machine, the schedule, the paging, and the conversion to rows.
What an Instaloader user notices first:
- The limit is exact.
resultsLimitis a ceiling on delivered posts, whatever a feed page happens to contain. Instaloader's--countdoes the same job; here it is also a ceiling on what you pay. - The date filter stops the run.
onlyPostsNewerThantakes a date or a window like7 days, and the run stops when the feed reaches it. Instaloader's--post-filteris a Python expression evaluated per post, which is more flexible and more work to get right. - Nothing that is not delivered is charged. Duplicates, posts outside your window, posts past your limit, and a run that cannot reach Instagram at all cost nothing.
- The output is a table. Each row carries the shortcode, URL, timestamp, caption, hashtags, like and comment counts, owner username, media type and the display image URL. There are no media files.
What a run costs, at that price:
| Run | Delivered posts | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| A first test | 10 | $0.005 |
| A day of one hashtag | 200 | $0.10 |
| A month of a busy hashtag | 10,000 | $5.00 |
| A scheduled poll with nothing new | 0 | $0.00 |
Pick it if you run the same hashtag on a schedule, want rows rather than files, and would rather pay a few dollars a month than keep a script alive. If you are weighing it against the store's other hashtag actors instead, see Apify alternatives for Instagram hashtag data.
How to switch from Instaloader
If you decide to move a hashtag job off Instaloader, the translation is short.
- Keep your account. You are going to need a session either way. In a browser signed in to that account, copy the
sessionidandcsrftokencookies from DevTools. - Map your flags.
"#hashtag"becomeshashtag.--count 500becomesresultsLimit: 500. A--post-filterondate_utcbecomesonlyPostsNewerThan(andonlyPostsOlderThanfor a closed window). - Run it once small. Ten posts, one hashtag. Check the rows have the fields your downstream sheet or script expects.
- Schedule it. Set an Apify schedule with a relative window such as
1 day. A poll that finds nothing new costs nothing. - Keep Instaloader for media. If you still need the files for some posts, the dataset gives you each post's URL, and Instaloader can fetch those.
Start from the getting started page or the overview.
The short verdict
- Staying local and want files: Instaloader.
- Building a Python app on Instagram: instagrapi.
- Many endpoints, no cookie, pay per call: HikerAPI.
- One hashtag's posts as rows, on a schedule, paid per post: the hosted actor.
The honest summary is that every option touching hashtags asks for either your Instagram session or your money, and most ask for one of them in exchange for the other. Choose the one whose cost you mind least.