Brand24 vs Awario for Instagram hashtag monitoring
Published
If the deliverable is a report somebody reads, Brand24 and Awario are both correct answers, and the one to buy is decided by the unit each counts rather than by the monthly price. Brand24 sells you a number of keywords. Awario sells you a number of topics, and a topic holds as many keywords as you like. For anyone watching more than a handful of Instagram hashtags that single difference moves more money than the gap between the two price lists.
This page compares Brand24 vs Awario on the plans each publishes on its own pricing page in September 2026, and ends with the case where neither is the right purchase.
The short verdict
| You are | Buy |
|---|---|
| Watching many tags together as one subject | Awario, because topics hold unlimited keywords |
| Watching a few named brands with deep AI analysis on each | Brand24 |
| On a tight budget and monitoring is the goal | Awario Starter at $29 a month on annual billing |
| Needing realtime refresh and events detection | Brand24 Pro or above |
| Wanting the posts themselves as rows, for your own analysis | Neither. See the last section. |
What Brand24 charges, as of September 2026
From brand24.com's pricing page, September 2026. The second figure in each row is the annual-billing price, which the page presents as the discounted one.
| Plan | Monthly | Billed annually | Keywords | Mentions / mo | Updates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | $249 | $199 | 3 | 2K | every 12h |
| Team | $349 | $299 | 7 | 10k | every hour |
| Pro | $499 | $399 | 12 | 40K | realtime |
| Business | $699 | $599 | 25 | 100K | realtime |
| Enterprise | from $1499 | from $1499 | custom | custom | realtime |
There is a free 14-day trial. Brand24 defines the thing it counts plainly, and the definition is worth reading before choosing a tier:
"A mention is a social media post, blog post, message board post, news article, etc - that contains one of the keywords you are tracking."
The page also states what happens when you go past the allowance, which matters if a hashtag spikes: it says you will never be charged more than the price of the plan you chose, and that if the account collects more mentions than the plan permits, Brand24 will contact you about an upgrade. So the overage is a conversation, not a surprise invoice.
Sentiment analysis is on every tier. The heavier AI features stack upward: events detection, the brand assistant and AI insights start at Pro, and Business widens insights to five projects and adds advanced reports.
What Awario charges, as of September 2026
From awario.com's pricing page, September 2026. Awario presents the yearly column as the headline and describes it as saving up to 40%.
| Plan | Monthly | Billed annually | Topics | New mentions / mo | Stored per topic | Team |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $49 | $29 | 3 | 30,000 | 5,000 | 1 |
| Pro | $149 | $89 | 15 | 300,000 | 15,000 | 10 |
| Enterprise | $399 | $249 | 100 | 1,000,000 | 50,000 | unlimited |
Every tier lists unlimited keywords per topic. Awario's own wording is the reason this comparison is not a price ranking:
"A topic is a keyword or group of keywords you are monitoring, such as your brand, a competitor, or a set of industry keywords. Every topic can contain unlimited keywords."
And on what a keyword may be: "The keywords can be plain text, social media handles, hashtags, or URLs."
Keywords against topics: the difference that decides it
Put the two units side by side on one job. Say you want to follow twenty Instagram hashtags around a single campaign.
| Brand24 | Awario | |
|---|---|---|
| Unit sold | one keyword | one topic, holding unlimited keywords |
| Twenty tags, one campaign | 25 keywords means the Business plan | one topic, so the Starter plan |
| Price for that | $599 a month on annual billing | $29 a month on annual billing |
| What you give up | nothing in analysis depth | the AI layer, and per-tag separation inside the topic |
That is a twentyfold price difference driven entirely by how each vendor defines a unit, not by how much data either one collects. It reverses the moment the tags need to be reported on separately, because a topic groups them: twenty separate topics on Awario is the Pro plan, and now the comparison is $89 against $599 with Brand24 offering considerably more per keyword.
The second axis is volume. Awario's allowances are an order of magnitude larger at every price point, but they carry a cap Brand24 does not express the same way. Awario describes the stored figure as:
"The maximum number of results a single alert can contain."
So Starter finds up to 30,000 new mentions a month and keeps 5,000 per topic. A busy hashtag fills that store, and the older results fall out of reach rather than queueing up for you.
The third axis is refresh. Brand24's entry plan updates every twelve hours and only reaches realtime at Pro, $399 a month on annual billing. If a hashtag is being watched because somebody needs to react the same day, that is the line the budget has to clear.
Who should buy which
- Buy Brand24 when the account is a small number of named subjects and the value is in the interpretation: sentiment, events detection, the AI insights and reports somebody presents. Its per-keyword pricing is the honest shape for a few important keywords watched closely.
- Buy Awario when breadth is the requirement. Many tags, many spellings, several languages, all rolling into one view, with export to .csv and boolean search to shape what gets caught. At $29 a month on annual billing it is cheap enough to run beside something else rather than instead of it.
- Buy both only at agency scale, where Brand24 covers the client brands and Awario covers the long tail of industry terms. Below that the overlap is too large to justify twice.
Neither is Instagram-only. Both cover the wider web, and a good part of what you pay for is the other sources. If Instagram is genuinely the whole job, you are buying a lot of coverage you will not open.
When a monitoring plan is the wrong purchase entirely
There is a third shape, and it is the one this site sells: a per-post feed. You name one hashtag, set a result limit and a date bound, and get the posts back as rows. No dashboard, no alerts, no sentiment, no other networks.
- You pay per row delivered. $0.0005 per delivered post, with no subscription and no per-run fee. A poll that finds nothing new costs nothing.
- The date filter stops the walk.
onlyPostsNewerThanends the run when the feed reaches your date, andonlyPostsOlderThanbounds the other end, so a week of posts costs a week of rows. A filter applied after collection hands you the same rows and a larger bill. - The limit is exact. You ask for a number of posts and that is the number you are billed for.
Four thousand posts a month is $2.00. That figure is not comparable to $29 or $599, because it buys something different: rows, and nothing on top of them. If you need the analysis layer, building it yourself costs far more than the difference every time. If the analysis already lives in your own spreadsheet, warehouse or notebook, the plan above is mostly paying for a dashboard you will export out of anyway.
A fuller version of that three-way comparison, with the other tool shapes, is in Instagram hashtag tracker options, and the wider field of feeds is in Instagram scraper options compared.
How to decide this week
- Count your subjects, not your keywords. One campaign of many tags favours Awario. Several separate brands favours Brand24.
- Check the refresh you actually need. Twice a day is fine for a monthly report and useless for a launch.
- Estimate the volume. A tag running past 30,000 posts a month is an Awario Pro conversation whatever the entry price says.
- Ask what the deliverable is. An interpretation means a dashboard. Data means a feed.
Brand24 and Awario both publish their prices openly and both do the monitoring job well. Awario wins on breadth per dollar because of how a topic is defined. Brand24 wins on depth per keyword and on how early realtime and the AI layer arrive. For one Instagram hashtag, polled on a schedule, with the analysis living somewhere else, the per-post meter is a cheaper shape than either.